TB Drug Comparison Tool
Key Takeaways
- Isoniazid remains the cornerstone of first‑line tuberculosis (TB) therapy but isn’t ideal for everyone.
- Rifampin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide are the most common alternatives, each with distinct strengths and weaknesses.
- Newer agents like rifapentine, bedaquiline and delamanid are reserved for drug‑resistant or special‑case TB.
- Side‑effect profiles, dosing frequency, drug‑interactions and cost drive the choice of alternative.
- Tailoring therapy to patient age, liver function, pregnancy status and local resistance patterns yields the best outcomes.
What Is Isoniazid?
When talking about TB treatment, Isoniazid is a first‑line, bactericidal antibiotic that targets the mycolic‑acid synthesis pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It was first introduced in the 1950s and quickly became the backbone of standard 6‑month regimens because of its high potency and low cost.
Typical adult dosing is 300mg once daily (or 900mg three times a week). Isoniazid is absorbed well from the gut, reaches peak plasma levels within 2hours, and penetrates lung tissue efficiently.
How Isoniazid Works and When It Falls Short
Isoniazid inhibits the enzyme InhA, blocking the synthesis of mycolic acids that form the bacterial cell wall. This makes it especially lethal to actively dividing bacilli. However, its reliance on host metabolism (via hepatic N‑acetyltransferase) creates two major challenges:
- Genetic variation in acetylator status leads to unpredictable blood levels, raising toxicity risk for slow acetylators.
- Liver toxicity-manifesting as elevated transaminases or, rarely, severe hepatitis-limits use in patients with pre‑existing liver disease or during pregnancy.
Additionally, mono‑resistance to isoniazid is now common in many regions, prompting clinicians to consider alternative drugs.

Alternatives Worth Considering
The landscape of TB drugs includes several agents that can replace or supplement isoniazid. Below are the most relevant alternatives, each introduced with a microdata definition.
Rifampin is a bactericidal rifamycin that inhibits DNA‑dependent RNA polymerase, killing both actively replicating and dormant TB bacteria.
Ethambutol is a bacteriostatic agent that blocks arabinosyl transferase, preventing cell‑wall synthesis. It’s especially useful for preventing resistance when combined with other drugs.
Pyrazinamide is a pro‑drug that becomes active in acidic environments, targeting dormant bacilli inside macrophages.
Rifapentine is a long‑acting rifamycin with a half‑life three times that of rifampin, enabling weekly dosing in certain regimens.
Bedaquiline is a novel diarylquinoline that inhibits ATP synthase, reserved for multidrug‑resistant (MDR) TB.
Delamanid is a nitro‑imidazooxazole targeting mycolic‑acid synthesis, also used for MDR‑TB.
Streptomycin is an aminoglycoside that interferes with protein synthesis, historically used when other agents are unavailable.
Side‑Effect Profiles at a Glance
Understanding toxicity is crucial because adverse events often drive drug switches.
- Isoniazid: Hepatotoxicity (5‑10% of patients), peripheral neuropathy (preventable with pyridoxine), rash.
- Rifampin: Hepatotoxicity (similar incidence), orange bodily fluids, many drug interactions via CYP450 induction.
- Ethambutol: Optic neuritis leading to color‑vision loss; risk rises with high doses or renal impairment.
- Pyrazinamide: Hepatotoxicity (higher than isoniazid), hyperuricemia, arthralgia.
- Rifapentine: Similar to rifampin but less frequent dosing reduces interaction burden.
- Bedaquiline: QT‑prolongation, requires ECG monitoring, hepatotoxicity.
- Delamanid: QT‑prolongation, nausea, occasional hepatotoxicity.
- Streptomycin: Ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, requires serum level monitoring.
Comparison Table: Isoniazid vs. Common Alternatives
Drug | Mechanism | Typical Dose (adult) | Major Side Effects | Resistance Rate (global avg.) | Cost (USD per 30‑day supply) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isoniazid | InhA inhibition (mycolic‑acid synthesis) | 300mg daily | Hepatotoxicity, neuropathy | ~10‑15% | ~$5 |
Rifampin | RNA polymerase inhibition | 600mg daily | Hepatotoxicity, orange fluids, drug interactions | ~5% | ~$12 |
Ethambutol | Arabinosyl transferase inhibition | 15mg/kg daily | Optic neuritis | ~2% | ~$8 |
Pyrazinamide | Acid‑activated disruption of membrane potential | 25mg/kg daily | Hepatotoxicity, hyperuricemia | ~3% | ~$7 |
Rifapentine | RNA polymerase inhibition (long‑acting) | 900mg weekly | Similar to rifampin, less frequent dosing | ~4% | ~$30 |
Bedaquiline | ATP synthase inhibition | 400mg daily (2weeks) then 200mg three times/week | QT prolongation, hepatotoxicity | Low (used for MDR‑TB) | ~$1,200 |
Delamanid | Mycolic‑acid synthesis blockade | 100mg twice daily | QT prolongation, nausea | Low (MDR‑TB) | ~$850 |
Streptomycin | Protein synthesis inhibition (30S ribosome) | 15mg/kg daily IM | Ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity | ~1‑2% | ~$25 |

Choosing the Right Regimen: Decision Factors
There’s no one‑size‑fits‑all answer. Here’s a quick decision tree you can follow:
- Assess liver function. If ALT/AST > 3× upper limit, avoid isoniazid and rifampin; consider ethambutol + pyrazinamide + a fluoroquinolone.
- Check for drug‑resistance patterns in your region. High isoniazid‑resistance (>15%) pushes you toward a rifampin‑dominant regimen.
- Identify patient‑specific factors: pregnancy (use ethambutol + rifampin), HIV (watch for rifampin‑induced antiretroviral interactions), renal failure (dose‑adjust ethambutol, avoid streptomycin).
- Consider adherence: weekly dosing (rifapentine) can improve compliance in directly observed therapy (DOT) programs.
- Budget constraints: generic isoniazid and rifampin are cheapest; newer agents require governmental or donor support.
Managing Side Effects When Switching from Isoniazid
If you’ve already started on isoniazid and need to switch, keep these tips handy:
- Baseline liver enzymes and vitamin B6 level; supplement pyridoxine 25‑50mg daily to ward off neuropathy.
- When moving to rifampin, alert the patient about orange‑tinged urine or tears-it's harmless but can alarm them.
- For ethambutol, schedule visual‑acuity and color‑vision tests every two weeks during the intensive phase.
- Introduce newer agents only under specialist supervision; monitor ECG for QT changes when using bedaquiline or delamanid.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I replace isoniazid with rifampin alone?
Rifampin is powerful but using it alone risks resistance. Standard practice pairs it with at least two other drugs (e.g., ethambutol and pyrazinamide) for the intensive phase.
What if I’m pregnant? Is isoniazid safe?
Isoniazid is generally considered safe in pregnancy when paired with pyridoxine, but many guidelines prefer ethambutol + rifampin to avoid potential hepatotoxicity.
How do I know if my TB strain is resistant to isoniazid?
A drug‑susceptibility test (DST) on sputum culture or molecular assays (e.g., Xpert MTB/RIF with additional probes) will reveal isoniazid resistance. If results are pending, clinicians may start a regimen that doesn’t rely solely on isoniazid.
Why do some patients develop peripheral neuropathy on isoniazid?
Isoniazid depletes pyridoxine (vitaminB6), essential for nerve function. Supplementing with pyridoxine prevents the tingling, numbness, or burning sensations that can otherwise appear.
Is weekly rifapentine as effective as daily isoniazid?
For latent TB infection, a 12‑week once‑weekly rifapentine+isoniazid regimen has shown non‑inferior efficacy and better adherence compared to 9months of daily isoniazid alone.
Bottom Line
While Isoniazid comparison often starts with “is it the right drug?”, the answer depends on liver health, resistance patterns, patient lifestyle and cost. Rifampin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide remain the go‑to substitutes in most standard regimens, whereas newer agents reserve their place for resistant cases. Always work with a qualified clinician to tailor therapy, monitor side effects, and adjust based on lab results.
1 Comments
nathaniel stewart
October 10, 2025 AT 21:14Dear colleagues, the comprehensive comparison you have presented elucidates the nuanced pharmacodynamics of isoniazid and its alternatives with remarkable clarity. I remain optimistic that such detailed insight will empower clinicians to customise therapy, thereby enhancing patient outcomes. Despite occasional typographical errors, the scientific rigour is incontestable.